Write-on Workshop

Components of the competition:

I. Casenote-60%
II. Bluebook and Editing Packets-20%
III. Personal Statement-20%

All work for the competition is to be done on your own. This means that no one is permitted to assist with, or even proofread, any of the materials that you are submitting for the write-on competition.

What we look for in a casenote
(A "model casenote", as well as examples of other accepted casenotes, are on reserve at the library):

I. Analysis

We evaluate the thoroughness, relevance, and effectiveness of the analysis. Skillful use of authority to support an argument, as well as critical, evenhanded analysis of the court\'s legal and policy arguments, are important here. Analysis is the most important factor in our consideration of the casenote.

II. Presentation

We emphasize clarity, conciseness, and persuasiveness.

III. Organization

We judge the overall structure and logic of the casenote. We also evaluate the apportionment of space and the integration of facts with legal arguments.

IV. Writing Ability

We consider grammar, syntax, sentence structure, spelling, word choice, and appropriate use of active voice.

V. Bluebook Form

We consider whether proper bluebook form is followed throughout the casenote.

Suggested Structure and Organization

I. Introduction

Briefly set out what the court held, and what your casenote will argue (thesis).

II. The Case

State objectively relevant facts and procedural history of the lead case, and the court's holding and reasoning.

III. Existing Law/Legal Background

A) What was previous law in this area?

B) Be concise, but use examples where necessary.

IV. Case Analysis

A) Was the case correctly decided? *Remember to stick to your thesis*

B) How does this case fit into, change, overule, existing law? Does it use the same mode of analysis to reach a different result? What impact will it have on future cases?

C) Does court adequately justify it approach or result-does it use previous law correctly or accurately? Is its logic consistent and persuasive? Are there issues and arguments the court did not consider?

D) Is the decision sound in light of public policy? Have other courts suggested alternative analyses that are better in light of public policy?

V. Conclusion

Summarize basic arguments and tie together piece.

We hope this helps you understand what a casenote is and what the write-on competition entails. Keep in mind that all of this information will also be provided in your competition packets. As always, please fell free to contact us with any questions about casenotes or the competition in general.

Thanks!
The Projects Department